![]() |
The really hot ticket among many cattlemen is carcass traits. Carcass traits are important and
carcass EPD's should be used. However, they should not be used exclusively in selection of bulls
and replacement heifers. If you compare the traits for maternal vs. feedlot performance vs.
carcass, you make a decision of their order based on this fact. If your cows will not work for you
in your environment, then your problems are a lot larger than whether or not your steers perform
in the feedlot or grade and have good carcass performance. Although carcass traits are highly
heritable, there are environmental factors that influence whether or not the calf will express his
potential. Extremes in weather (hot & cold), days on feed, ration quality and length of feeding can
change the carcass performance of steers/heifers of the same genetics. Other things such as age of
castration, implant protocol, and the length of the feeding period can do the same. In using
carcass information, you must know what the industry target is for carcass characteristics:
| Characteristics | Target | Acceptable Range |
| Slaughter Weight | 1225 | 1025 - 1350 |
| Carcass Weight | 775 | 650-850 |
| Ribeye Area (sq. in.) | 14 | 11 - 15 |
| Ribeye Area/ cwt. of Carcass wt. | 1.8 | 1.7 - 1.9 |
| Yield Grade (1 - 5) | 2 | 1 - 3.5 |
| Backfat Thickness (in.) | .4 | .3 - .6 |
| Quality Grade | Choice | Prime - Select |
| Marbling | Small | Slight - Abundant |
| Maturity | A | A |
Most producers in Florida (90%--1998 South Florida Beef Forage Program Survey) raise their
own replacement heifers. That being the case, the focus of genetic selections will come from the
sire and certainly maternal traits should be considered. Birth weight, mature weight, and hip
height are highly heritable. I am sure you are no different than I am in how we feel about a cow
that will drop a calf and walk away from it. The cow that shows no maternal instincts is just not
the type of brood cow that we want in our herd. We also have to think about performance both
at the ranch and in the feedyard. Weaning weights, yearling weights, ADG, and feed conversion
are just some of the performance traits. Although most producers put the greatest emphasis on
weaning weights, yearling weights are also important as an indicator of the acceptable slaughter
weight that the industry is trying to obtain.
I probably should have titled this article "Single Trait vs. Multiple Trait Selection of Herd Sires".
I did not though, because I wanted cattlemen to focus more on the difficulty of the overall
selection process and that it is not as easy and singular in focus as some would have it appear.
That 1225 pound slaughter weight calf is produced by a frame 5-6 cow that in moderate flesh (bcs
of 5) weighs 1200 - 1300 pounds and when mated to bulls of equivalent frame and weight. If we
go strictly for a carcass trait, then we can quickly get in trouble with cows that are too large for
the Florida environment. A good road map to selection would begin with a thorough
understanding of where a cow herd is and where we want it to be in the future. Then use the
tools available to select with, such as EPD's and actual animal performance, ratios, etc. The final
selection tool should be visual appraisal of the animal. To accomplish the task of buying the right
bull to go into the cow herd is not easy. The producers who have been the most successful have
stayed to the middle of the road and with multiple traits in their selection process. Again I
encourage you to look up Rick Machen's article and read it. If you can't find it, give me a call
and I will make a copy for you. Good luck in your bull buying this fall.