Bermudagrass Renovation Demonstration Trial

May , 2021
Dr. Joao Vendramini & Dr. Maria Silveira, UF/IFAS Range Cattle Research & Education Center

Bermudagrass (Cynodon dactylon) is one of the most important species in the southeastern USA with about 20 million acres of planted areas for livestock grazing and hay. Some of the bermudagrass cultivars used for grazing, hay, or silage production in Florida includes Coastal, Tifton 85, Alicia, Jiggs, Russell, Tifton 44, and Mislevy.

Forage and beef cattle producers in Pasco Co., FL had the perception that bermudagrass hayfield production declines every 5 years and disking the hayfields periodically would renovate the field and increase forage production. There was a misperception that the decline in forage production was due to soil compaction due to frequent traffic of machines for forage harvest. However, there is strong evidence from research projects conducted at the UF/IFAS Range Cattle Research and Education Center that pasture disking does not increase forage production, and it may actually decrease production. In addition, research projects have demonstrated that one of the main causes for a decrease in production and persistence of bermudagrass hayfields in Florida was insufficient potassium fertilization and harvest practices.

In association with Ed Jennings, former Livestock Extension Agent in Pasco Co., we conducted an on-farm demonstration to evaluate the effects of disking and fertilization in a Tifton 44 hay field. A Tifton 44 hay field with declining production and persistence was identified by a producer and 10 acres selected for the trial. Half of the area (5 acres) was disked with a tandem disk 3 times and rolled, as recommended by the producers. The area was disked on February 2nd. The other half of the area was not disked. The entire area was fertilized with 300 lb/acre of 21-00-21 on February 23rd.

The forage production and nutritive value in the hayfield was evaluated on May 2nd and September 15th.

Forage production was 2.5 times greater in the non-disked than disked hayfield in the first harvest (Table 1). In the second harvest, the forage production was still 1.2 times greater for the non-disked than disked area. Considering the 2 harvests, the non-disked area produced a total of 7,000 lb DM/acre versus 5,200 lb DM/acre for the disked area.

The disked area had greater crude protein and TDN in the first harvest (Table 1) because the forage was from new plants germinating from the rhizomes and tops, while the plants in the non-disked area were established and had greater proportion of stems and older tissues. There was no difference in nutritive value in the second harvest.

After the second harvest, the ground cover was evaluated and there was 93 vs. 82% bermudagrass ground cover in the non-disked vs. disked area.

Table 1. Forage production and nutritive value of bermudagrass hayfields disked or non-disked for renovation.

Harvest 1 Harvest 2
  Forage
Production
    Forage
Production
   
Treatment (lb DM/ac) CP (%) TDN (%) (lb DM/ac) CP (%) TDN (%)
Non-disked 1,800 11.8 53 5,200 15.8 53
Disked 700 17.4 57 4,500 15.3 53

This extension demonstration proved that disking hayfields for renovation purposes decreases forage production, increases cost due to disking, and increases the chances of soil erosion and nutrient loss. Proper fertilization, primarily with potassium, is an effective management practice to increase bermudagrass forage production and persistence. It is expected that approximately 35 forage producers and 7,000 acres of bermudagrass hay production in Pasco, Sumter, Citrus, Hernando, and Hillsborough counties were impacted by this educational effort.

Disked vs Non-disked pasture

Photo above is of pasture that was disked (left) vs. non-disked (right) 

 

Return to top